tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3102070382234437186.post6723273864454366887..comments2017-06-16T13:14:57.798-07:00Comments on Table of elements. Limits of quantum mechanics.: hfilipenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06344406823520817701noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3102070382234437186.post-45465947345204566662017-06-16T13:14:57.798-07:002017-06-16T13:14:57.798-07:00http://www.kayelaby.npl.co.uk/atomic_and_nuclear_p...http://www.kayelaby.npl.co.uk/atomic_and_nuclear_physics/4_2/4_2_1.html<br /><br />You've got Hf at 76, but the Bohr-Moseley model would put it at Z=75, since Z-1 = 74 for the Bohr-Mosley model. Of course relativistic effects are already starting to increase binding energies here over the classical model, so all elements heavier than this come out with Z's too high by the classic model. But does anybody think relativity is wrong? Why can't we use relativistically-corrected binding energies to find Z?Steve Harris, MDhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00441192270997429724noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3102070382234437186.post-73081289712721069002017-06-16T13:08:49.613-07:002017-06-16T13:08:49.613-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Steve Harris, MDhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00441192270997429724noreply@blogger.com